« The Task of the Storyteller | Main | Caligari and German Expressionism »

March 04, 2008



How big is the thing going to be in reality, when built? This is the question. Size matters to humans, it seems. It fashions their responses, just as it shapes their thoughts. The sense of proportion is what is diminished or demeaned when huge big constructs emerge as the end result of benign miniature modellings, depending on ... what? It is Ok to visit a monument to pay tribute to the thing that is represented by it, but it doesn't seem so OK to end up living in one.

Richard Prouty

The Dubai project is about 6.5 square miles, or the size of a city neighborhood. In that sense, the generic city has the rough outlines of the kind of neighborhood Koolhaas claims is nostalgic and out of date.

After writing this post, about twelve other ideas came to mind, which is often the case. Even in Schaumburg, IL, the closest place to a generic city I know, has elements of the urban. Because of all the Indian software engineers who work for the banks and insurance companies there, Schaumburg actually has some excellent Indian restaurants--as good as any you'll find in Chicago or New York. The urban is something that simply happens. Architects have been trying to control the urban for 150 years, and they still can't do it.


Let me get this straight: one of the world's most renown architects is proposing to pave over more of the gulf with a send-up on the vapid incongruity of Perimeter Center, Atlanta or Irving, Texas? Putting aside the argument that soulless warrens of office parks need no assistance in spreading worldwide, and the fact that Dubai without OMA seems to be doing an enviable job of bringing just that sort of carbon copy sprawl to fruition, I feel disappointed that this is the work of what we consider one of our greatest architectural geniuses.
Koolhaas's searing observations of contemporary urban phenomena rightly deserve acclaim, and I really admire a lot of his designs, but I myself am totally missing what is the point of this particular plan, beyond the irony of it, and how, aside from sticking a spray-painted mothball in one corner of this model, this project distinguishes itself from Business Bay or other planned sectors of Dubai, and exactly what an inhabitant of this new city is supposed to find worthwhile in his experience of it. I am reminded of Safdie's play, Private Jokes in Public Places.

Richard Prouty

I totally agree with you. Everything about the project is perplexing, so much so that I wonder if the finished product won't be a generic city at all. Koolhaas can't be serious about building one--not with the biggest commission he's ever likely to get. This is the guy who once designed a Prada store, after all. My impression is that the generic city is something that develops all by itself, not something that's deliberately designed. The concept of the generic city undermines the very idea of architecture as a professional practice. Why hire a name architect to design an anonymous thing?


Just what the design is specifying is a question I am not sure I understand either. Are these little matchstick blocks in the model just place-holders, a la Ground Zero proposals, or just what is being articulated? From the small image I can just make out, in the center left quadrant, a sort of 4-legged CCTV, and on the far left a slightly elongated United Nations. Otherwise I read only a sort of double-wide La Defense (Champs and all). Are these willful references or is this Koolhaas plays Monopoly?
To move beyond the era of starchitectural white elephants is commendable, count me on board. But the focal buildings here could seem to be the worst sort of hybrid of generic and acontextual. Perplexing indeed.
The only reference in the OMA oeuvre which these images bring to my mind is The City of the Captive Globe from Delirious NY. To realize or recall that scheme in built form is the sort of wild dream for which the phenomena of Dubai and its neighbors might provide a contemporary visionary with an unparalleled opportunity. A Canary Wharf of interconnected CCTVs is more what I am getting at. A shame that Rem didn't put forth that level of provocation, at least as an initial proposal...
I feel sort of like a 15-year old whose beloved indie cerebral rock band just put out a album of elevator music and advertising jingles with a mediocre radio single.


i feel R.K. was probably simply taking the Royal, not to mention the more-catholic-than-the-Pope middle-eastern urbanite's, taste into consideration. I also suspect R.K. of taking the opportunity here not so much to indulge a nostalgic dream of his, as to test its viability.

Dubai is well and truly geared to becoming a 21st - or even 2nd - century world centre. As such, it needs urgently to be created in its own image. The image that the Emirates population can visualize is conceivably a grandchild of today's world, a hybrid breed that combines Western looks (and efficiency) with the Eastern (delusion of) grandeur. No room (or time) here for the organic growth of anything parochial.

I suppose this must explain the fact that in the small scale model we can see both the usual skyline of any mega city of the western world; this, to make the "neighbourhood" seem familiar and inviting, while the futuristic element, namely the 'eyeball', is perhaps put there to help capture the hearts of the less provincial. Very grand indeed!

Personally, I favour the idea of small 'villages' linking up by necessity, retaining, in the process, some of their identities while giving a non-total identity to the resulting urban cluster. R.K.'s design seems to be in agreement with this notion, insofar as its size (for info on which I thank R.Prouty) is concerned.

However, I am totally against the idea of skyscrapers. They do not fit the idea of a neighbourhood. They in fact mock it. Skyscrapers can make a pretty skyline to look at at night, with the sky bit removed. They're designed and built to minimize cost. This must be the reason why - and I'm only guessing here - the tastes of the users who are not necessarily in the profession, are never consulted before these things come into existence.

Sorry about the long-winded comment!

Richard Prouty

I should mention, first of all, that someone from OMA visited on 3/8, so maybe the general sense of confusion and disappointment voiced here will have some effect.

It's as if Koolhaas is more comfortable starting with an individual building and then relating it to its broader context than he is starting with the context and working to individual buildings. After reading the comments here I'm starting to wonder if Koolhaas is building a Koolhaas City, a city consisting entirely of own best designs. Add up all his challenges to traditional urbanism and skyscraper design and you get the Generic City. I don't see the orange tube of the Illinois Institute of Technology student center, at least not yet.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Your Information

(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)

What Is One-Way Street?

One-Way Street [Einbahnstrasse, 1928] was Walter Benjamin's first effort to break out of the narrow confines of the academy and apply the techniques of literary studies to life as it is currently lived. For Benjamin criticism encompasses the ordinary objects of life, the literary texts of the time, films in current release, and the fleeting concerns of the public sphere. Following Benjamin's lead, this blog is concerned with the political content of the aesthetic and representations of the political in the media. As Benjamin writes in One-Way Street, "He who cannot take sides should keep silent."